Here
            you will read about how we did our research.
        To read more, click here or download the PDF - 440kb. 
        In this project, we took an ethnographic approach to
          research.  That
            is, we became engaged with learning circles, familiarized ourselves
          with how they work, listened to the participants talking about them,
          became part of their world as much as we could, wrote about them out
          of this experience of engagement and listening.
        Our writing took place in several stages.  First,
          we wrote narratives about the learning circles.  Then we wrote analysis pieces, focused
            on aspects of learning circles that seemed particularly important to
            us.  You can find these analysis pieces on this website by going
            to values and practices of learning circles.
        This writing became the basis for discussion among
          the Researchers and the Lifelong Learning Working Group.  The discussion was long and
            complex, continuing as the Researchers continued to meet with learning
            circles and learn about them.  This discussion deepened the analysis
            and lead to new ways of understanding the learning circles as we met
            with them.  This, in turn, led to new questions to explore with
            the learning circles and among the Researchers.  We Researchers
            began to see ourselves as a learning circle in our own right.  And
            we were also part of a larger learning circle, the Lifelong Learning
            Working Group, which had begun the discussion about inclusive lifelong
            learning, and which continued to help us to understand the significance
            of what we were seeing in the research.
        In the last year of the project, we brought more people
          into the process of analysis-through-discussion at a symposium.  The symposium brought
            together sixteen participants representing three rural learning circles,
            two Indigenous learning circles and four urban learning circles.  This
            group also included members of the Working Group, the Researchers, a
            staff person from the Federation of Women’s Institutes of Ontario
            and faculty and researchers from the Centre for Aboriginal and Indigenous
            Studies at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the
            University of Toronto.  
          In this project, our beliefs about research have been clarified.  We
            know that an ethnographic approach to research can be used effectively
            by adult educators, in this case literacy workers, who are not trained
            as researchers.  We know that analysis can be developed collaboratively,
            through discussion.  We also know that this discussion can be
            extended beyond the research group to the participants in the study,
            by applying the inclusive practices that we observed in the learning
            circles.